logo

63 pages 2 hours read

Adam Higginbotham

Challenger: A True Story of Heroism and Disaster on the Edge of Space

Adam HigginbothamNonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3, Chapters 20-24Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3: “The Face of God”

Part 3, Chapter 20 Summary: “Friday, January 10, 1986”

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death.

At seven o’clock in the morning, the crew of the Columbia prepared to launch, despite being in the midst of a thunderstorm. Despite being under pressure to launch as scheduled because Acting Administrator Bill Graham had traveled from Washington, DC, to watch the launch, this was impossible, and the launch was delayed.

As 1986 got underway, NASA looked forward to a busy year, with a record number of missions planned. Among these were missions to broadcast color images of Haley’s Comet and plans to bring the largest-ever telescope, the Hubble Space Telescope, into orbit. However, the Columbia had repeatedly faced setbacks and malfunctions. These were due in part to the wear and tear of reusing the equipment but also to human error, as NASA was running its staff ragged, with many of them working 12-hour days without any days off. Delays in the Columbia’s launch further interrupted the launch schedule of the Challenger. NASA was under pressure to find ways to make the Challenger flights stick to their schedule regardless since they were tied to the navigation of Haley’s Comet.

The Columbia finally launched two days later on January 12, and the focus quickly shifted to the Challenger. The seven crew members—Scobee, McNair, Resnik, Smith, Onizuka, Jarvis, and McAuliffe—flew from Houston to Cape Canaveral, where they completed their final press conference. Each had invited dozens of friends and family to witness the launch, and they also traveled to rented condos and hotels near the Florida launch site. Due in large part to the excitement surrounding the Teacher in Space program, a number of politicians, celebrities, and international dignitaries were also planning to witness the launch in person.

With the launch scheduled for the morning of Sunday, January 26, the crew attended a barbecue with their close family on Friday before heading into medical quarantine. Saturday brought cold weather. The head of the shuttle program, Jesse Moore, said that he would wait until late afternoon to decide whether or not to delay. At nine o’clock that evening, he and others conferenced with meteorologist Scott Funk, who explained that the cold front was still traveling across Florida and would arrive at the Cape at five o’clock in the morning, bringing with it clouds, fog, rain, and thus poor visibility. The chance of a successful launch in such conditions, he said, was 50/50. The forecast for Monday, however, was favorable, though Tuesday promised more cold temperatures—even colder than those that had plagued the mission one year earlier. At 10 o’clock on Saturday night, Moore announced to the media that the launch was being rescheduled for Monday morning.

Sunday morning, however, brought warmer-than-predicted temperatures. Launch Director Gene Thomas lamented that it would have been the perfect day to launch. The cold front was moving slower than expected and threatened to interfere with Monday’s newly planned launch. That night, the astronauts watched the Super Bowl and had dinner with their spouses while crews began filling the Challenger with fuel for the morning’s launch.

Part 3, Chapter 21 Summary: “Monday, January 27, 1986”

The family of the astronauts arrived early that morning to watch the launch. Problems cropped up immediately: First, the shuttle hatch refused to latch properly, and then a bolt on the hatch handle became stuck in place. Removing the bolt took over two hours, delaying the launch. By 12:30 pm, it was called off.

At Launch Control Center, engineers were pessimistic about launching the following day (Tuesday), as record-cold temperatures were predicted. Nevertheless, the relaunch was scheduled for 9:38 am on Tuesday, January 28. Back at the Marshall Space Flight Center, Solid Rocket Senior Program Manager Larry Wear had a vague recollection of Thiokol engineers mentioning concerns about cold temperatures. Thiokol was contacted, and Roger Boisjoly—immersed in researching a new solution for the joint problem and therefore oblivious to the upcoming launch—responded with alarm. He and his team scrambled to pull together data that would provide a recommendation on whether or not to launch in such cold temperatures.

Meanwhile, the astronauts and their families, given the weather, were certain that the launch could not possibly take place on Tuesday. Anxiety was high, but they tried to remain patient. On the evening news, failure of the morning’s launch gave more bad press for NASA.

Around six o’clock in the evening in Utah time, Thiokol completed its presentation for NASA. Though some of the information was speculative, they ultimately warned NASA not to launch on Tuesday.

Part 3, Chapter 22 Summary: “Monday, January 27”

NASA readied for an 8:15 pm conference call with Thiokol management and engineers. NASA had just learned that the ships sent out into the ocean to retrieve shuttle boosters had had to turn around because of the weather conditions—another sign that conditions looked poor for a morning launch.

The meeting started on a shaky note, as the Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama had received Thiokol’s presentation via fax, but the Cape had not. There was some scrambling on Thiokol’s end to complete and check final calculations before the meeting finally began, 45 minutes late. Boisjoly explained how the O-rings were compromised by low temperatures, which caused them to lose their elasticity and thus fail to do their job of sealing the joints to prevent fuel leaks. Despite his confidence that the O-rings could not be deemed fail-safe, Boisjoly knew that his presentation lacked the kind of hard and conclusive evidence that NASA would require. Nevertheless, Thiokol’s management ended the presentation with a recommendation not to launch. This was in keeping with its precedent: Inconclusive data was always an automatic recommendation not to launch. 

However, this time, it seemed that the NASA personnel were suggesting that inconclusive data meant that they did not have a solid enough reason not to go ahead with the launch as planned: This was the view taken by NASA’s project manager on the boosters, Larry Mulloy. Mulloy further countered that the increased delays were costly, triggering a chain reaction of delays in the entire year’s launch schedule. Thiokol asked for a recess so that they could discuss the matter privately.

When the conference resumed, the Thiokol managers had completely changed positions: Three of the four changed their positions, recommending launching in the morning. Only Vice President of Engineering Bob Lund held out until the other three urged him to comply with the majority. He reluctantly changed his vote. NASA asked Thiokol to put its recommendation in writing, something it had never done in the past. Thiokol agreed to do so, and the launch was scheduled for the following morning—less than nine hours after the call ended.

Part 3, Chapter 23 Summary: “Tuesday, January 28, 1986”

At two o’clock in the morning, the ice team arrived at the launch pad. Since faucets had been turned on in order to prevent pipes from freezing, the entire pad and everything surrounding it was covered in thick layers of ice from where the water had run and then frozen. Ice Team Director Charlie Stevenson contacted Launch Director Gene Thomas, who told him to find a way to get rid of the ice. The launch time was pushed back an hour to 10:38 am, and the fuel was loaded into the boosters.

Earlier, at five o’clock that morning, some astronaut family members woke up to travel to the launch. Others delayed: Mike Smith told his wife that he was certain the launch would be pushed back until Thursday. The astronauts were transported via NASA van to the launch pad after their breakfast, just as the sun was beginning to appear. The outdoor air temperature was 24˚ Fahrenheit. The ice team was in the process of smashing up the thick ice. 

By 9:07 am, the astronauts had climbed inside the orbiter and were in position. At the same moment, Thomas pushed the liftoff back to 11:08 am. Family and friends of the astronauts were gathered on bleachers. In New Hampshire, Christa McAuliffe’s school was gathered in its auditorium, ready to watch the launch live with much of the rest of the United States. By 10:38 am, the outdoor temperature had reached 34˚. 

Stevenson informed Thomas and astronaut Dick Scobee, positioned in the cockpit, that the shuttle was ready for liftoff. Thomas conferred with Jesse Moore, NASA’s associate administrator for space flight. Moore was at the toe of the chain and would be the final one to decide whether or not the launch would go forward. At 11:29 am, he deemed that it would. The terminal count began, with nine minutes until liftoff.

In Utah, the Thiokol engineers and administrators gathered to watch the liftoff. Roger Boisjoly remained at his desk, but a manager insisted that he join the rest of the team for the viewing. At 11:38 am, they watched as all three engines fired and the shuttle lifted off. The 25th space shuttle mission—Challenger—had cleared the tower. Boisjoly breathed a sigh of relief, telling his colleagues, “[W]e’ve just dodged a bullet” (350).

However, the cold had compromised the O-ring, making it too inflexible to close the gap in the joint. Gas at a temperature of over 5,000˚ Fahrenheit broke both the primary and secondary O-ring seals. At seven seconds into the flight, the orbiter turned onto its back over the Atlantic Ocean, as planned. Then, the most dangerous part of the launch approached, when the shuttle would face the most extreme forces. The order was given to throttle the craft, and 57 seconds after liftoff, the maneuver was successfully completed. 

One second later, fire burst through the joint of the right booster. The flame grew larger and then reached the external fuel tank. In three seconds, the fire spread across the tank, igniting the liquid hydrogen. At 72 seconds from liftoff, the tank exploded, and the shuttle became a fireball, swallowed up by plumes of smoke. Pieces of the shuttle began falling from the sky at 1,500 miles per hour. At 73 seconds, Mission Control lost contact, and the radio contained only static.

Part 3, Chapter 24 Summary: “Tuesday, January 28, 1986”

When the shuttle exploded, some of the family members of astronauts and other spectators did not instantly understand the reality of what had happened. A few held out hope that the orbiter had successfully flown away from the cloud of smoke, likely landing on one of the emergency pads. However, pieces of the shuttle were falling from the sky, 17 miles out over the ocean.

Steve Nesbitt, the official commentator, finally reported the explosion. NASA’s Mission Control immediately went into lockdown: No one was allowed to leave, phone calls were prevented, and all data were immediately collected and secured. NASA transported family members to a secure location while preparations were made to transport them home. An hour after the explosion, George Abbey officially informed them that NASA had no hope for survivors.

In the Launch Control Center, officials did little but sit in stunned silence. After an hour or so, Launch Director George Thomas viewed the replay of the explosion over and over. No one was immediately certain what had gone wrong, and the initial thought shared by many was that the Challenger had suffered some sort of engine malfunction.

President Reagan gave a brief statement to the press, though he—like NASA—had no information to provide. He decided to cancel that evening’s scheduled State of the Union address and instead make a statement about the tragedy. At 4:30 pm, NASA Assistant Administrator Jesse Moore finally addressed the press, giving NASA’s first official statement. He could offer no reason for the explosion and stressed his unwillingness to speculate. He assured them, however, that he had made the decision to launch very carefully.

At five o’clock that evening, President Reagan delivered a speech authored by Peggy Noonan. It would become one of the defining speeches of his presidency. Around the same time, Vice President George Bush delivered condolences in person to the families. That night, NASA flights transported them back to Houston.

Part 3, Chapters 20-24 Analysis

The detailed, hour-by-hour moments leading up to the explosion provide an important explanation for how and why the disaster occurred, reflecting The Political and Economic Pressures of Exploration. The rush to launch was driven by several factors. The growing expense of the shuttle program was a perpetual concern, as delays were regarded as a waste of money and further hindered NASA’s ambitious plans to dramatically increase the number of launches scheduled for the year. NASA’s ambitions reflected their grandiose vision of shuttle flights becoming an everyday norm. In a sense, NASA seemed to believe that it could force this dream into reality before other factors—such as science and finances—were ready. Instead, there was pressure to adhere to the launch schedule, no matter what. 

Similarly, the teleconference between NASA and Thiokol points to the great pressure that Thiokol felt to comply with NASA’s wishes. Knowing that NASA was considering ending their contract, Thiokol’s managers knew that delivering bad news to them could be severely detrimental for the company. The order that Jerry Mason gave of “thinking like a manager” rather than an engineer encompasses this dilemma succinctly: A manager is concerned with efficiency and sound financial spending, prioritizing these factors over science and safety. 

The section also speaks to The Failure to Learn From Past Errors. NASA broke with its usual protocols in arguing that the inconclusive data provided by Roger Boisjoly’s team was rationale not to delay the launch. Rather than placing the burden of proof on proving the O-rings completely reliable and fail-safe, NASA was now asking for the reverse: absolute proof that they would definitely fail. They decided that a “likely” chance of failure was not cause enough for alarm, but it was for Boisjoly. Once again, NASA continued to remain focused on the success of past missions, essentially dismissing the damage of the O-rings because no human had ever been hurt during a shuttle expedition. Boisjoly’s knowledge that prior missions had come perilously close to exploding still did not factor into NASA’s decision-making; their inability to heed Boisjoly’s advice led to their decision to launch.

Higginbotham’s description of the second-by-second happenings of the launch enables readers to “watch” the explosion take place with the understanding and knowledge that those who actually witnessed it did not have. By overlaying hindsight with the real-time images, Higginbotham invites the layperson to understand the mechanics of what went wrong that day behind the scenes.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 63 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools

Related Titles

By Adam Higginbotham