39 pages • 1 hour read
Martin Buber, Transl. Walter KaufmannA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Human beings crave relationship and interpersonal communication. To be human is to move from the desire to know things as objects to know people as subjects. Buber would never deny that human love and desire for knowledge is a very good thing, but he points out that this is not our primary goal and ultimate end. The ultimate end of the human being is, rather, to enter into relation with another Thou, set in relation to the I: “I do not experience the man to whom I say Thou. But I take my stand in relation to him, in the sanctity of the primary word” (15, emphasis added). This primary word is the word of I—Thou, and human experience of relation and interpersonal communion is wholly distinct from the experience of things in the world as objects.
In fact, it is only in relation that personal identity becomes real as well. The two realities of I and Thou are realities only when seen in relation to one another. In the same way that a father is only a father in light of the existence of a son or daughter, the I is only an I in light of the existence of another Thou (be it human or divine). The recognition of Thou is what actually creates the I, bringing it into existence as something that transcends one’s existence as a mere individual object in a world of countless other objects.
The challenge of human existence is to continually struggle against the overwhelming force of the world of It in contrast to the world of Thou. Buber puts this in the language of fate: “Every Thou in the world is by its nature fated to become a thing, or continually to re-enter into the condition of things” (21). Putting the nature of the problem this way, Buber highlights the human tendency to drag relations and personal subjects back into the realm of knowledge and experience. By doing this, we are able to put the world in a box, making it easily understood, categorized, and manipulated. Human beings naturally have this tendency on account of their desire to constantly understand the world and have power over it; but the building of the personal I needs to struggle against this tendency in order to allow the subjective to have priority over the objective.
Finally, since the Eternal Thou functions as the ultimate end and source of all existence, all cultivation of human relationship finds its ultimate fulfillment in the fabric of reality as it exists. Viewing the world of It, human beings fall away into non-existence, but recognition of the one, true reality of Thou allows the person to move toward true existence under the sway of the Eternal Thou.
The search for the Eternal Thou is fundamentally the search for God. As Buber states at the outset of Part 3: “Every particular Thou is a glimpse through to the eternal Thou” (61, emphasis added), meaning that every single time the I recognizes and enters into communion with the Thou, it is ultimately a connection and encounter with God. Buber admits that this relation to the Eternal Thou has taken on many forms over the years, and that human beings have given this many names in their own cultures, but he insists that the experience (and the reality) is the same.
Even those who deny their search, or who proclaim to hate God, nevertheless speak of the Eternal Thou who gives existence to their being by the very fact that they recognize any Thou at all. Since God exists in and through all things—“there is no such thing as seeking God, for there is nothing in which He could not be found” (64)—the entirety of human life is lived in and for the desire for communion with the Eternal Thou. The movement from the world of It to the world of Thou is a progressive movement toward the Eternal Thou, no matter the relation to any thing or anyone, for “all else lives in its light” (63).
In the seach for relation, the human person also realizes that the cosmos is incomplete without their active participation and relation with God. While most would consider a relation “to” God to be all that is possible—seeing as how the view of classical theism claims that human beings need God in a way that God does not need human beings—Buber claims that is the person’s relation “with” God that is crucial: “How would man be, how would you be, if God did not need him, did not need you? You need God, in order to be—and God needs you, for the very meaning of your life” (66). Due to the all-encompassing nature of the Eternal Thou, this Thou needs the personality and intention of human beings in order to complete the consummation of the cosmos. If the divine spirit brings the world into existence in order to share the nature of spirit with rational, spiritual creatures (i.e., human beings), then it makes perfect sense to speak of the need which God has for them, since this is merely to speak of God’s need to stay true (in justice) to God’s own plans for creation.
The nature of human connection demands personal recognition that human beings require community. The distinction between experience and relation is of the utmost importance in parsing this out. Buber states repeatedly that experience is the enemy of relation: “Man travels over the surface of things and experiences them. He extracts knowledge about their constitution” (12). Experience, then, is the process of extraction from objects in the world; it is a stripping of the truth from its natural origin in order to possess that abstracted extraction within the mind. Take, for example, a tree. When we experience that tree, we experience its qualities and the logically-divisible notions that make up those aspects of the tree that we can come to know and preserve in our memory.
This is what Buber means by experience: the logical and intellectual abstraction of things in the world in order to possess them within ourselves. This is in contrast to genuine relation due to the nature of relation to be a simultaneous receiving and giving. In knowledge and experience, nothing is given; in relation, in the world of Thou, the person gives of themselves to the Thou whom they are in the process of encountering. “IF I FACE A HUMAN BEING AS MY Thou, and say the primary word I—Thou to him, he is not a thing among things, and does not consist of things” (15). Recognition of another Thou is the recognition that human beings are not enough on their own: The person is not self-sufficient, this is a mere myth.
When the I is seen as an individual, it defies relation, in contrast to the existence of the I as a person: “Individuality makes its appearance by being differentiated from other individualities. A person makes his appearance by entering into relation with other persons” (51). It is the rejection of individuality that allows the person to flourish and safeguard itself from the fading of the truly real. As Buber says, “The more a man […] is mastered by individuality, the deeper does the I sink into unreality” (53). The orientation of the I to the Thou is the manner in which the person is cognizant of reality. This ordering to the Thou is the interior disposition of human nature to always live in community, since “in pure relation you have felt yourself to be simply dependent” (66). As I—Thou is the primary word of human existence, it is no shame for Buber to insist that human dependence on one another is actually cause for great joy.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: