42 pages • 1 hour read
Samira AhmedA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Novels that look at the reach and power of social media are growing in number, given the relatively recent emergence of such communication networks. Internment, marketed as a Young Adult title, investigates the power of social media and how it enriches the responsibility of Millennials and Gen Z-ers to be a part of the real world. For many, social media is a distraction, a frivolous digital conversation about trivial concerns. Although Layla’s courageous defiance of the Director inspires the camp’s internees to action, it can be argued that her actions do not ultimately end with the closing of the camp and the liberation of the detainees. It is only through the broad reach of social media, sparked and then sustained by Layla’s writings that Jake and David smuggle out of the camp, that international protests finally move the President to halt the camp’s operations. Social media has given an entirely new meaning to the cliché of the media era: the whole world is watching.
It is one of the disturbing realities of history that the atrocities visited on the Jews and other marginalized groups by Nazi Germany went on for years without the knowledge of the Allies. Journalists were slow in reporting the horrors conducted in Hitler’s camps. Here, in contrast, through the efforts of Jake and David, the world is aware of Camp Mobius within days of its opening. In addition, the video of the Director abusing camp residents, among them Layla, are recorded by Red Cross reps and immediately go viral. The awkward restraint the Director shows reveals his awareness that, unlike the camp guards in Nazi Germany whose atrocities would remain secret for years, he must deal with social media and the impact it has on creating instant public opinion. With social media, suddenly the truth is out there—a catchphrase from The X-Files whose t-shirt Layla wears—and available to a world-wide audience. As David reassures Layla, “You have the world’s attention” (249).
When the Director summons Layla for interrogation, his goal is clear: “Who is writing those lying blogs that are causing such a ruckus?” (320). It is social media that takes the lead in exposing the camp’s brutality, a reminder for the book’s target audience of young adults that social media has empowered them to convert outrage into activism.
The camp is situated in a particularly stunning, remote stretch of the Sierra Nevada desert. From the moment Layla arrives, she is taken by the stark beauty of the snow-tipped mountains, the umbrella night sky plashed with stars, and the rugged arrangements of giant boulders. She is her father’s daughter, with the heart of a poet. “The landscape is bleak,” Layla records as the caravan approaches the gates of the camp, “but undeniably beautiful” (61).
What puzzles Layla, however, is how nature could be so beautiful and yet the camp so ugly. She asks, “Can nature be ironic?” (166). What Layla learns during her stay at the camp is how nature may be alluring, its accidental collisions of lines, shapes, and colors stunning to an appreciative eye, but ultimately nature is indifferent. Reflecting the sobering credo of the turn-of-the-last century naturalists—among them Stephen Crane whom Layla quotes—for Layla nature is not immoral; it is indifferent to the human evil the camp represents. For all its intoxicating beauty, the landscape has no sympathy concerning the chaos created by humanity.
Later when Layla is assigned work detail in the camp’s vegetable garden, she relishes the generous warmth of the sun, basking in it during the hours spent outside the claustrophobic confines of her family’s trailer. She savors thrusting her hands deep into the treated soil of the garden and carefully planting seeds. For her, the process suggests her own efforts to build a coalition of protesters among the camp detainees. She wants nature to confirm her efforts and to endorse the campaign for freedom. But she understands nature has no sense of what is happening at the camp; it is serene in its indifference and chilling in its determination to abide—despite humanity, not because of it. Nature thus aggravates Layla’s already profound sense of the camp’s remoteness and her own psychological sense of smallness and helplessness. As she argues, “The simple loveliness of the sky and sun and mountains makes me feel like nature is complicit in my country’s betrayal, its lack of interest itself amoral” (61). She understands that her appreciation of the beauty of nature will be forever marred by her memories of Mobius” (226).
The conventional wisdom is that the age of reading is long over. Some propose that Millennials and their successors are the first generations of so-called a-literates—people able to read but without much interest in reading—and that visual media and digital communications have made the written word an amusing and irrelevant act of nostalgia. Ahmed begs to differ. Internment is a novel, not a protest march, a petition, a law or a film. More specifically, it is a novel full of writers, teeming with quotes from fiction, nonfiction, and poetry. The work is designed, by the author’s own admission, to spur readers to take action in the name of what is right. That resistance begins with words. Layla is a writer, and her resistance to the evil of the camp begins with her sitting down one sleepless night and writing down her observations about the camp operations—writings that will be secreted out of the camp and ultimately launched into the broad expanse of social media.
“Have you read any Nietzsche?” Layla asks Ayesha early in her time at the camp. It is perhaps an odd question when posed in an illegal internment camp for Muslim Americans where survival is most people’s sole concern. But when Ayesha, who hesitates to believe that a ragtag group of misfit teenagers can do anything to close the camp, voices her concerns, Layla asks whether she is familiar with Nietzsche's quote, “All I need is a sheet of paper and something to write with and I can turn the world upside down” (163). Here, the novel endorses the power of language to effect change in a world. The novel is threaded with references to Emily Dickinson, Walt Whitman, Stephen Crane, Jane Austen, Dante, John Lennon, Ursula K. LeGuin, Aldous Huxley, Arthur Miller, and other writes who inspire Layla. In turn, Layla uses the power of words to inspire the camp detainees. In truth, poets do not topple governments or close relocation camps. But poets inspire those who do. Writers give voice to those who cannot find their way to adequate expression; they give voice to a culture at pitched moments when it is undergoing massive change, both for the good and for the not-so-good. In writing an essentially cautionary tale to her own troubled and troubling era, author Ahmed affirms what her novel affirms: the power of the word not to change the world—that is the overripe rhetoric of idealists—but rather to effect change by raising awareness and inspiring action.
In an unguarded moment of candid sharing, Jake Reynolds, who emerges as the novel’s moral center, tells Layla the backstory of his elaborate compass tattoo. On a hiking trip just a few years earlier to Mount Shasta with his parents, his mother gave him a compass to lead them on a short hike between two small lakes. Jake was apprehensive. His mother assured him to use the compass: “A compass doesn’t know where you are going, and it doesn’t tell you where you to go. It can only point you a direction. It’s up to you to always find your true north” (287).
The story impacts Layla. It suggests that within each person is a kind of moral integrity that cannot be altered, distorted, or lost despite a difficult real world that, like the woods when Jake first receives the compass, can be intimidating in its vastness and confusing in its careless organization. A person must, Jake’s mother advises him, know where they want to go—the compass can only help them get there. The analogy to Layla’s own emotional dilemma suggests that no one can tell Layla what to do or how to do it, but she knows in her heart that the camp is wrong and that the camp must be closed. She knows what she wants—her determination to close the camp becomes her true north. Although she is uncertain whether she is doing things the right way, she knows the camp is a moral abomination. Layla’s true north guides her in her decision to lead the camp’s protests. Finding one’s true north, setting a clear goal and then moving toward it, becomes a symbol of Layla’s coming-of-age. She arrives at the camp a teenager but departs as an adult, all by following her sense of her own true north.
After the camp is closed, as Layla prepares to leave with her family, she remembers Jake’s story. He is dead now, a victim of the camp’s vicious inhumanity. But his words guide Layla as she leaves the camp and walks through the main gate. She knows her life will never be the same. Layla can never “recover from this camp that burned itself into her [skin]” (373). Uncertain where she is going save out of the camp, Layla calms herself by echoing Jake’s parable about true north: “I might not know exactly where I go from here, but I’ll find my direction” (376). In this, true north becomes a symbol of self-confidence and the integrity of an individual’s identity.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Samira Ahmed