24 pages • 48 minutes read
Katherine MansfieldA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
William is the story’s first protagonist, an upper-class man who lives and works in London and travels to visit his wife and children in the country on the weekends. He is anxious and self-conscious, preoccupied with his increasing alienation from Isabel and his children. He wants to provide the best possible life for them but reflects that his children are mainly preoccupied with the gifts he brings them, and Isabel seems less and less interested in seeing him at all. While these thoughts produce a “gnawing” feeling in his chest, he soothes himself by focusing on his work.
While William feels isolated due to his wife and her friends’ behavior, he shows his own biases in the story’s opening scene on the train; seated in first class, he thinks derisively about “a red-faced girl” trying to catch the train, calling her “hysterical” (2). Likewise, he sees “a greasy, black-faced workman” and thinks “a filthy life!” (2). His attitude toward lower-class people is unsympathetic and unimaginative and illustrates the class situation in England in the 1920s. Modernists were often concerned with anti-hierarchical ideas, and Katherine Mansfield injects class critique into the story through William’s unkind thoughts here.
Still, William is a man enamored with his wife and traditional ideas of family life. On the way home, he can’t help thinking about Isabel the moment the cityscape turns into a rural, green landscape: “[T]he fields, the sky, the sailing bird, the water, all said, ‘Isabel’” (2). “Countless imaginary meetings” flood his mind as he imagines his wife lovingly greeting him (2), a sharp contrast with the reality of their reunion when he is alone and “forgotten” by Isabel and her friends. After quietly enduring insults and isolation over the weekend, he composes a letter to Isabel that expresses his hurt feelings. The contents of this letter are ambiguous, and Mansfield leaves the fate of their marriage up to interpretation—it is unclear whether William will continue trying to find happiness with his estranged wife, but he is permanently changed by the end of the story, no longer able to ignore or fantasize away his hurt.
The second main character is Isabel, who is first depicted through William’s memories. She has undergone a major shift in character by the time the story begins. The first signal of her transformation is “the new way” she laughs (1), which is described as derisive rather than joyful. She laughs at William when he tries to speak with her, telling him not to “be so dreadfully stuffy—and tragic,” as if she “killed” their love (3). To William, she is largely unrecognizable, a change that started when she went to Paris with Moira Morrison; in the text, Paris stands for sophistication and cutting-edge art and culture. She dismisses everything old and “sentimental,” including the family’s old home in London, and now spends all of her time with bohemian friends in the country. This also manifests in selfishness; she keeps the fruit William brought for their children and goes bathing with her friends, leaving William by himself. She does not defend him when her friends mock him, telling them, “[B]e nice to him, my children! He’s only staying until to-morrow evening” (5).
The story shifts to Isabel’s perspective in the final scenes, when she is alone with her friends and receives William’s letter. She is confused by the letter’s contents, “more and more excited, even frightened” and decides it is “absurd, ridiculous” (8). These mixed feelings—particularly fear—hint that William might be putting an end to their current arrangement, where his salary funds her and her friends’ lifestyle and they only insult him for it. At first, she mocks the letter and shares it with her friends, and her new laugh returns. However, she suddenly stops laughing and is “exhausted.” When she flees into her bedroom, she has an epiphany, realizing her behavior is “vile, odious, abominable, vulgar” (8). She is on the precipice of honoring her marriage and husband by writing back, but she ultimately gives in to the immediate pleasure of her friends’ company. While at first her new way of laughing is observed through William’s eyes, the narrator now highlights it, suggesting that her new lifestyle is ingrained in her.
Moira Morrison is the catalyst for Isabel’s change; she gives a studio party that William and Isabel attend, and afterward, Isabel and Moira go to Paris together. Moira positions herself as a sophisticated artist, telling William, “I am going to rescue your wife, selfish man. She’s like an exquisite little Titania” (3), and she introduces Isabel to her set of bohemian artist friends.
However, descriptions of Moira counteract her self-perception and highlight The Shallowness of Bohemian Circles. She wears a “bonnet like a huge strawberry” (4), appearing ridiculous rather than avant-garde. She comes across as vain and shallow, and what she talks about is inane, for example, “wondering what color one’s legs really [are] underwater” (8). While she is ostensibly an artist, her latest discovery in the story is simply sleeping: “It’s so wonderful. One simply shuts one’s eyes, that’s all. It’s so delicious” (7). Like her friends, Moira is preoccupied with frivolity and eating, simultaneously relying on William’s generosity and disparaging him.
Moira refers to Isabel as “Titania,” alluding to the Queen of the Fairies and Oberon’s wife in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. This implies that Isabel is enchanting, but like Oberon, the King of the Fairies, Moira acts as a sort of stage director, managing and directing all the interactions among her protégés. At the end of the story, she calls Isabel “Titania” again when Isabel is debating staying and writing to William. Her influence on Isabel is very strong, and when she “pipes,” like a magical piper, Isabel changes her mind again, postponing her reply to William.
Bobby Kane, Dennis Green, and Bill Hunt are secondary characters, three members of Isabel’s bohemian clique. Like Moira, they are all self-important and consider themselves artistic but do not demonstrate any talent. Dennis is a writer but only utters platitudes; at the end of the story, he asks to reproduce William’s letter in his novel, reinforcing the idea that he is unoriginal. Bill is a painter but refuses Isabel’s request to paint the group, dismissing the idea by saying, between bites of food, “Light’s wrong.” Bobby might be a dancer—he has a “Nijinsky dress”—but like his friends, his main role is to consume. He is first seen walking out of a candy shop without having paid for anything, relying on Isabel’s generosity.
Instead of participating in sophisticated or artistic activities, the three men come off as parasitic and superficial. They eat “enormously” (6), laze about, and have surface-level conversations. They seem to have the most energy when they are mocking William; they all laugh hysterically when Isabel reads his letter aloud. During her epiphany, Isabel realizes that their behavior is base and vile: “And again she saw them, but not four, more like forty, laughing, sneering, jeering, stretching out their hands while she read them William’s letter” (8). The three men are flat, static characters, almost caricature-like, who reflect Isabel’s worst traits. Her decision to prioritize them over writing to William hints that her behavior will grow more like theirs.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Katherine Mansfield