56 pages • 1 hour read
Barbra StreisandA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In the prologue to her memoir, Barbra Streisand comments on how her public perception has been skewed by all of the lies and rumors spread about her in the media. Revealing the truth about herself is the primary reason Streisand writes this autobiography, yet she worries that her words won’t be enough to dispel the gossip: “I’m scared that after six decades of people making up stories about me, I’m going to tell the truth, and nobody is going to believe it” (13). The more famous she becomes, the more lies are told about Streisand, who is a proponent of absolute truth and frequently repeats phrases such as “I can’t stand the lies” (99) throughout her memoir. Early in her career she wanted to respond to the false accusations: “For years, whenever I read something about myself that was completely untrue, my first impulse was to correct it” (580). However, her manager always prevented her from doing so, knowing that reacting would only have drawn more attention. Streisand argues in her memoir that she is the only one who can be trusted to tell her truth.
Though she is unable to ensure that the press only reports the truth about her, Streisand makes a point of always being honest in her art. Throughout her memoir, she discusses how she turns her vision into reality by connecting with and researching the characters she plays and always including a piece of herself in each performance. In an imaginary letter to her idol, acting coach Lee Strasberg, she focused on the importance of lived experience to authenticity in acting: “When you have the privilege of being up on a stage, raised above the audience, you owe them something more…something truthful” (55). Similarly, she writes that “Nothing works if you lie. No meaning will transmit, and the audience doesn’t feel anything [...] A scene can be imperfectly shot, but if it has truth at its core…that’s enough. Truth is universal. It hits home. It touches people’s hearts and minds” (755).
In the final chapter of the memoir, Streisand sums up this core conviction:
I believe in the power of the truth. It’s always worked for me as an actress and a singer and a filmmaker. I’ve seen how strongly people are moved by the truth when they recognize it in a performance. There’s no place for lies in art (1151).
In her art and her life, truth is absolutely essential to Streisand, and she goes to great efforts to express it.
Streisand was always convinced she would be a star, noting in her prologue, “I wanted to be an actress ever since I was a child...maybe from the moment I was taken to my first movie, and stood up on the seat so I could see the screen” (14). She went to great lengths to become an actor, using music as a way to become known before being cast in her first Broadway play. Yet she quickly realized that fame isn’t everything she’d hoped it would be: “Looking back, it was much more fun to dream of being famous than to actually be famous [...] Fame is a hollow trophy” (1155). For one thing, the press fixated on her appearance because she was a successful woman who did not fit traditional beauty standards. One of the first reviews she received when she was 19 called her “an ‘amiable anteater’” (12)—a description mocking her prominent, aquiline nose. Streisand notes several other things her nose was called in the same year, emphasizing how often her looks were commented on over her talent. Dealing with fame has meant accepting often misogynist and antisemitic criticism that she cannot respond to.
Though Streisand enjoys making art, having a public image has often unnerved her, which has led reporters to believe she is ungrateful for her fame. Streisand bristles at the idea that fame makes her different than anyone else. For instance, when she cut short an interview because she didn’t feel well, the journalist’s response was not sympathetic: “[The journalist’s] attitude was basically, You’re rich and famous and you’re not allowed to have a headache” (798). She is also irritated that the public, and especially the press, believes that she owes them something because they know who she is. She gets mad when people ask her to sing on command, as she doesn’t even sing in her own home and writes that “they think they own you, because they paid for that album” (544).
Overall, Streisand is surprised by how much her fame seems separate from her lived experience as a normal person. Though she frequently describes herself as “rather ordinary” (14), her image is of a controlling, tyrannical, temperamental diva. Though she wants to change this perception, she knows that she cannot control the content produced to sate a demand for gossip that sells: “most reporters had some preconceived idea of me, and that’s what they were going to write. It almost didn’t matter what I actually said. […] it’s much harder to make a positive piece interesting. It’s the negative pieces that get all the attention” (291).
However, Streisand also uses her fame tactically, performing at fundraisers, campaigning for politicians, and raising money for charities. Though she does not always appreciate her celebrity, she understands how it can benefit others.
Throughout her career, Streisand has faced several obstacles as a woman working in the male-dominated entertainment industry. Even as a teenager working in the theater, she was frequently sexualized by male colleagues; in her first TV interview, the host ridiculed her unique living situation by suggesting that she was promiscuous: “So you sort of sleep all around town?” (103). Directors and other co-workers often didn’t take her seriously when she began acting, often believing the claims of other men rather than judging Streisand for who she was. For example, when former castmate Sydney Chaplin told those working on the set of Hello Dolly! That Streisand was difficult, her new director turned against her, even though the truth was that Chaplin had been emotionally abusive to Streisand. Streisand realized all the mistreatment she faced on set was the result of male colleagues fully buying into another man’s version of the story: She “was up against the boys’ club” (347). Streisand experienced the same misogyny even when producing her own films; sometimes the crew she hired would not listen to her input even when she had final say on a film.
The more success Streisand attained in Hollywood, the more scorn came from many of the men around her. After writing, directing, producing, and starring in Yentl, she was criticized for being too controlling as a director. However, male directors who are equally detail-oriented would never have been called this gender-based insult. Despite winning the Golden Globe for Best Director for Yentl, she was snubbed by the Oscars—not even receiving a nomination—and by the Directors Guild of America. Others wanted to attribute her achievement to male mentors or collaborators. When her friend, Steven Spielberg, praised her final cut of Yentl, enthusing, “Don’t change a frame” (705), the media misconstrued this as him giving her editing advice. On later projects, Streisand did not get the appropriate level of respect. When she was directing The Prince of Tides, her costar suggested she sit on his lap backstage and publicly went against her direction. At one point, her camera operator blatantly lied to her; when she asked why, his response was only to shrug and say “The boys’ club” (855).
Streisand does not accept the misogyny that impedes her progress; she has often spoken out against the double standards in the industry, critiquing the men who perpetuate this misogyny and the women who buy into it. Additionally, through her movies, she often comments on and breaks down gender stereotypes, hoping to influence the culture through her art.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: