logo

50 pages 1 hour read

Alvin Schwartz

Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark

Alvin SchwartzFiction | Short Story Collection | Middle Grade | Published in 1981

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Impact of Setting in Horror Storytelling

In fiction, setting—the time and place where a narrative unfolds—anchors a story in an all-important grounding of logic, verisimilitude, and atmosphere, giving its imaginary events a basic believability and emotional power. In a horror story, the setting plays a particularly crucial role since the events are largely illogical and unnatural: The story’s backdrop must prepare the listener/reader for the supernatural (or otherwise disorienting) events to come, often by creating a mood of isolation, danger, or the uncanny. For instance, horror stories tend to strand their protagonists, usually alone, in dark, menacing places far from home: abandoned houses, nocturnal forests, misty paths, old graveyards, and lonely highways. From the start, these settings weave an atmosphere of loneliness, vulnerability, and dread, so when the horrific or supernatural elements of the tale come into play, they appear almost logical to the reader. The isolated setting also intensifies the terror: Cut off from all help and perhaps doubting their rational state of mind, the lone protagonist has little or no avenue of retreat or reassurance. Most of the tales in Scary Stories feature backdrops like this—dark, lonely settings familiar to the reader from other spooky stories—serving as spine-tingling variations on a well-known theme.

In “What Do You Come For?,” “Me Tie Dough-ty Walker!,” “The Haunted House,” and “Wait Till Martin Comes,” a lone character enters an old, abandoned house, typically at night, priming the listener for eerie, if not macabre, goings-on. In all of these stories, the atmosphere of dread thickens with each passing minute as grisly sights and sounds mount up, e.g., decaying body parts falling, one by one, into a fireplace and then forming a body; a chimney reverberating with an eerie refrain, sung by a severed head that suddenly drops onto the hearth; footsteps in the cellar, followed by gasping and thrashing noises and finally a ghost with a skeletal face treading slowly up the stairs; and eerie, watchful cats gathering one by one in a room, each bigger than the last, talking menacingly. In all, the slow burn of the nightmarish events flows (super)naturally from the dank, foreboding setting of the haunted house. Similarly, the boy in “The Big Toe” is trapped horribly alone in his dark bedroom when the spectral menace comes for him, creeping slowly through the house, and the girl in “The Girl Who Stood on a Grave” has no companion to tell her that she has simply pinned her skirt to the grave in the dark. In “The Walk” and “High Beams,” a dark forest path and a road at night, respectively, become settings for lonely terror, and in “The Babysitter,” the spookiness of sitting up late in a strange house is heightened by the presence of vulnerable children. In all these stories, as well as in “Room for One More,” “The Hook,” “The Attic,” and “The Ghost With the Bloody Fingers,” the threat of entrapment in a confined space (whether a house, a forest, an elevator, or a car) provides much of the atmosphere and creeping terror.

Additionally, many of the stories are set in a previous era, before telephones or emergency services, deepening the sense of vulnerability and isolation. “Cold as Clay,” “A New Horse,” “The White Wolf,” “The Wendigo,” and “The Haunted House,” some of which are based on old folktales, all seem to unfold in a previous century before the advent of modern, civilized life and the aura of safety and rationality it provides. Moreover, many of the protagonists and other characters seem to be farmers or hunters, implying the isolation of farmlands or rural areas far from the hubs of civilization. As Sherlock Holmes observes in Arthur Conan Doyle’s “The Adventure of the Copper Beeches,” “[L]look at these lonely houses, each in its own fields […] Think of the deeds of hellish cruelty, the hidden wickedness which may go on, year in, year out, in such places, and none the wiser” (Doyle, Arthur Conan. “The Adventure of the Copper Beeches.” Strand Magazine, June 1892). In many of his stories, Alvin Schwartz exemplifies the use of setting to tighten the screws of horror by removing (or diminishing) the comforts of sunlight, companionship, the rationality of modern life, and the hope of rescue or escape.

The Power of Stories Read Aloud

As the title of Schwartz’s collection suggests, horror stories (particularly the “jump stories” in Part 1) become especially potent when told or read aloud—ideally in the darkness or around a fire that casts mysterious shadows on the walls or trees. As Schwartz suggests in his Preface, “[T]he best time to tell these stories is at night” (3). For their full dread to sink in, the stories must also not be told too loudly or too briskly: “The best way is to speak softly, so that your listeners lean forward to catch your words, and to speak slowly, so that your voice sounds scary” (3). Schwartz’s stories, short as they are, achieve their effects by forcing the listener to wait, amid an atmosphere of hushed, mounting dread, for the promised jolt of terror (or humor): the sudden drop of a severed head or the “viper’s” knock on the door. As such, the teller must be an actor as well as a reader with an impeccable sense of timing and drama. As Schwartz understands, the atmospherics of any story, but particularly a scary one, can be intensified by an imaginative telling, e.g., with an eerily modulated voice and suspenseful pauses. Indeed, the jump scares of stories like “The Big Toe” or “What Do You Come For?” only truly work if read aloud to a group of listeners—one of whom will, by design, be singled out by the teller for a climactic scare, making them both participant and target of the story’s terror. In later tellings, then, the suspense of who will be the chosen “victim” adds to the story’s spine-tingling tension.

Inevitably, stories read loud will be different each time, as the reader—or readers—vary their telling depending on the conditions (like the darkness of the room or the noises or stillness of the woods), the teller’s unique talents, the specificity of the audience and their reactions, or just the mood the teller is in. In “Me Tie Dough-ty Walker!,” for instance, the teller may try different voices for the dog or the bloody head or make the dog’s nonsense song grow gradually softer rather than louder to try out new effects on the listeners. (In interviews, Schwartz acknowledged that he intended his stories mostly as frameworks for the teller’s improvisations and embellishments.) For an audience, a story heard aloud is worlds apart from a story read alone because it is out of their control: The teller can do what they want with it. The physical immediacy of horror stories when read aloud, including the sudden screams and gestures (like pointing and stamping), can bring the narratives as close to a real-life scare as possible—and forge an exciting bond between the listeners. As an emotion, horror is enjoyed more fully in the safety of a group than individually, and a skilled reader can bring immersive new depths to the words on the page, becoming Schwartz’s collaborator in terror.

The Macabre Marriage of Illustration and Text

Scary Stories may have been intended (ideally) to be told aloud and in the dark, but most fans of the stories encounter them on the page under a strong light—the better to savor Stephen Gammell’s grim black-and-white illustrations. Spidery, veiny, skeletal, oozing, fetid, and cadaverous are but a few of the words and feelings evoked by these strange, bleak drawings, which seem to dribble from the page like bodily effusions. As a shivery substitute for actually hearing Scary Stories intoned eerily in the dark, Gammell’s macabre artwork more than complements Schwartz’s tales: Some readers even consider them to be the most memorable thing about the classic book series.

Scary Stories’ atmospheric drawings show how a skilled artist’s interpretation of a story can help anchor it in the reader’s imagination, giving it a unique texture not otherwise present in the work. For instance, Schwartz’s writing style is concise but unadorned, with relatively simple words and not much visual description. Gammell’s finely nuanced drawings, on the other hand, overflow with lurid, putrescent detail: gangrenous fingers and toes; oozing, mutilated limbs; glazed eyes; shredded flesh; and leering mouths. Another unsettling feature of the illustrations is the nightmarish world that it imagines, where not only monsters and villains but protagonists, too, are grotesque (such as children, preachers, babysitters, and teenagers). His illustration for “The Babysitter,” for instance, depicts the innocent titular teenager and the baby she cradles as lumpish, gnomelike creatures with swollen heads, crooked features, and torpid expressions. Slithering down the babysitter’s legs are weird, tendril-like strands, an eerie motif of Gammell’s work. None of his characters, human or otherwise, are graced with regular features or symmetrical bodies, asymmetry being a creepy signifier of the abnormal and uncanny.

It is this very baroqueness of detail that provides the rich, pungent descriptions that have been left out of Schwartz’s terse writing. Together, word and image conjure a fallen world that still seems, to many young readers, almost illicit in its gleeful, shocking morbidity. To be sure, the sheer ghoulishness of Gammell’s artwork has its humorous side as well, and (like the book’s gross-out songs) this comic excess takes some of the sting out of death and decay. Nevertheless, in 2011, after 30 years of parents’ complaints, HarperCollins reissued the series with new, tamer illustrations by a different artist. Six years later, following a hue and cry from readers young and old, the original drawings were restored. Over the decades, Gammell’s illustrations have become so inextricably wedded to Schwartz’s text in readers’ minds that Scary Stories strikes many as a completely different (and significantly lesser) work without them—an unusual circumstance for a short story collection.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 50 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools