66 pages • 2 hours read
Lee StrobelA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
After Strobel graduates from law school at Yale, he moves to Chicago to start working for the Chicago Tribune, one of the most prestigious newspapers in the nation. He serves as a legal editor for the paper, and over the next 14 years, Strobel would earn awards for his excellence in reporting. Perhaps more importantly, his news beat exposed him to the realities of the Chicago legal system, and it showed him how evidence functions within the court of law. That knowledge serves as the structural backbone for The Case for Christ, and Strobel uses his legal knowledge to formulate a convincing argument for Christianity.
In order to help readers better understand elements of his argument, the Chicago Tribune becomes a motif in his book. He repeatedly returns to his time and experiences at the paper to contextualize the logical ideas he leverages throughout his argument. For instance, Strobel tells readers about his award-winning investigation into Ford’s cover up of a deadly flaw in the Ford Pinto that caused it to “explode when struck from behind at about twenty miles an hour” (71). He uses this example to show readers how important it is to verify the accuracy of sources, including the Bible.
He returns to his Tribune experience again in Chapter 6, when he tells the story of Richard Moss, who stood “accused of shooting a nineteen-year-old Chicagoan to death” (146). Moss’s lifelong friend, Ed Passeri, took the stand only to falsely confess to the crime in an attempt to protect his friend. Again, Strobel takes this modern-day example and explains what it can teach readers about investigating the Bible. Through this story, Strobel shows readers the importance of “rebuttal evidence,” or proof that helps “‘explain, counteract, or disprove’ a witnesses account” (147). This is a particularly important concept to grasp, especially since many of Strobel’s experts offer rebuttal evidence to counterarguments from skeptics, atheists, and fringe theological groups like the Jesus Society.
Thus, the motif of the Chicago Tribune serves two purposes in The Case for Christ. First, it provides readers a modern touchstone for some of the more theoretical argumentative concepts in Strobel’s book. Whether it is corroborative evidence, rebuttal evidence, or the importance of forensic science, Strobel first shows readers the evidence’s efficacy in a modern context before translating it to Christianity and the Bible. Secondly, the motif reminds readers that Strobel is uniquely qualified to serve as their guide on this investigation. His legal knowledge allows him to provide convincing evidence, while his journalism skills help him convey experts’ arguments and conclusions in a clear, understandable manner.
Another motif in The Case for Christ is the importance of credentialing. Each of Strobel’s main chapters features a lengthy interview with an expert in theology who usually weighs in on their field of study. Strobel goes to great lengths to seek out specialists in their fields, like Dr. Alexander Metherell—a doctor who has extensively researched the crucifixion—and Dr. John McRay—a historian and archaeologists who specializes in Middle Eastern archaeology. But Strobel also exhaustively credentials each expert, too. He lists their degrees and conferring institutions, their fields of study, their publications, areas of expertise, and any other relevant information. He even gives readers a physical description along with reassuring attributes, like Dr. Ben Witherington III’s Southern “hospitality” (177) or Dr. Bruce Metzger’s “quick mind” (75).
As Strobel explains in his story about Harry Aleman and Louis Almeida, testimony is only as strong as its witness. In that case, Almeida’s testimony against Aleman was compromised. Not only did he have reason to finger Aleman for murder (Almeida had been offered “leniency” (96) in his sentence if he cooperated), Almeida was a criminal himself. Almeida’s criminal history and motivation for helping “tarnish[ed] his credibility”(96)—after all, he has already lied, stolen, and broken the law. But the reverse is true, too. The more credentialed a person, the more believable their testimony. That is why Strobel works so hard to make sure his experts are beyond reproach. Not only does he want to prove to readers that each one is extremely qualified to weigh in on Christianity’s authenticity, he also wants to make sure readers trust what they say. To put it another way, who is a reader more likely to trust: a small-town pastor or a professor of theology with a degree from Cambridge?
This process is also important because in many cases, Strobel’s expert testimony is the only evidence he has to substantiate certain positions. With a few exceptions (like Dr. Edwin Yamauchi’s history books or John McRay’s archaeological maps), most of the experts rely on evidence within the Bible itself to prove their points. For example, Dr. Gary Habermas’s assertions about Jesus’s resurrection are founded mostly on the creed found in 1 Corinthians with other evidence from the Bible. He rarely cites outside sources, mainly because the resurrection is a biblical issue. But that makes Habermas’s credibility even more important. If readers have any reason to doubt his honesty and truthfulness, it compromises the rest of his testimony. That is why credentialing is so important—and so pervasive—in The Case for Christ; it substantiates Strobel’s evidence and helps readers trust Strobel’s overall conclusions.
From the very first pages of The Case for Christ, Strobel leverages legal terminology to make his argument. As the book unfolds, he presents a case to the reader, just as an attorney presents a case to the court. He asks readers to serve as a “jury in a real trial,” complete with an “open-minded and fair” (18)consideration of the evidence for Christianity. Given this, readers with even a passing familiarity with the legal system will see all the same elements of a trial within Strobel’s book: an opening statement (Strobel’s introduction), expert testimony (each chapter’s interviews), cross-examination (when Strobel questions experts’ conclusions), and a closing argument (Strobel’s conclusion).
Strobel does this for specific reasons. In the United States, the legal system is also referred to as the justice system; as the name implies, the goal of the courts is to consider cases fairly and reasonably and uphold the law. Additionally, the justice system is often tasked with uncovering the truth. Consider some of the most high-profile criminal cases in recent memory. In each instance, the court’s job was to listen to the evidence, determine the facts of the situation, and deliver a verdict. In other words, most Americans believe that the court’s job is to uncover and uphold the truth.
Thus, Strobel uses the legal system as a symbol for the truth. By filtering the case for Christ through a legal structure, Strobel is able to make a more convincing argument for Christ. Readers already believe in the justice system’s ability to uncover the truth, so by co-opting the trappings of a court case, Strobel all but guarantees that readers will be more likely to accept the book’s conclusions as fact. Ultimately, this technique serves as a subtle means of persuasion to help Strobel convince readers that the “verdict in the case for Christ” (361)reveals that Jesus is indeed the Son of God.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: