53 pages • 1 hour read
Dominic SmithA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In The Last Painting of Sara de Vos, Dominic Smith sheds light on the creative process and the function of art.
The descriptions of how Sara comes to create At the Edge of a Wood give the reader insight into the creative process allowing the artist to produce works of art. Sara brings technical expertise to her craft—how to use the camera obscura, perspective, the vanishing point, and particular colors to produce a painting. Smith’s attention to the non-technical aspects of her work—including her state of mind when she produces the art, her perceived audience, her financial status, and choices she makes to communicate a particular message—allow the reader to see that producing art is not simply a mechanical process of mimicking the world on canvas.
The history of At the Edge of a Wood is a case in point. The genesis of At the Edge of a Wood combines Sara’s grief at the death of Kathrijn and a chance sighting of “a girl emerging alone from the wood” (27). The act of painting “seems to wick away some of the ungodly anguish” (42) Sara feels over this death. The painting’s creation distracts Sara from the creation of more lucrative work on the tulip paintings, but her values as an artist are such that she has little respect for those who “buy the paintings like so many tables and chairs” (44). Sara understands her family needs her paintings to survive, but she rejects the idea of seeing art simply as one more commodity to be bought and sold.
Despite these ideals and the fact Sara never envisions sharing At the Edge of a Wood with anyone, her debt forces the sale of the painting. Like all artists, she loses control over the audience for her work as soon as it goes out into the world. The consumers of her work assign meanings she never intended—starting with Pieter de Groot and continuing all the way down to Ellie and Marty.
Smith uses the details of the sale of the art to show that a work, no matter how much it is the reflection of intangibles such as human emotion or spirituality, is ultimately a material object as well—one reflecting the economic conditions under which the artist creates and market forces like scarcity that assign value to the piece of art. As Sara’s apparent sole work, the painting’s exclusivity makes it valuable to collectors like Marty. The possibility of more than one copy of the painting is a concern about authenticity but also economic value. The original painting is Marty’s property; it is part of the substantial wealth he has as a de Groot and which makes him the envy of his co-workers during the benefit for orphans.
Marty’s changing relationship with At the Edge of a Wood and other works adds the perspective of the viewer of art. When Marty looks at a work of art, “he wouldn’t even be thinking about the paintings themselves [….] The thoughts would rush in but eventually strip away, peel back to reveal a kernel of bare sentiment” (49). In other words, what Marty sees is himself, not the painting.
When Marty looks at At the Edge of a Wood, he sees a link to his Dutch ancestors, who have had the painting for 400 years. At the end of his life, Marty sees the painting as his legacy, one that will endure because the paintings connect him to “a bloodline of want, to shipbuilders and bankers who stared up at them as their own lives tapered off” (270). The durability of the paintings and impermanence of the de Groot men are called to mind when Marty views the paintings. Even in this reflective moment, Marty thinks about the art as a prop for his identity.
In the end, Smith does not privilege art as a reflection of intangibles transcending the material world over art as a material object. Nor does he ultimately privilege art as what is in the eye of the beholder over art as the message of the artist to the world. The novel, instead, is an invitation to consider the many ways of looking at art.
For much of American and European history, women have traditionally been considered either outsiders or mere objects in the world of art. Women’s status as models rather than creators of art, unnamed helpers rather than artists whose signatures appear on paintings, and—even now—as people who are seen as intruders in related artistic disciplines such as art history reflects the impact of society’s subordination of women to men. The structure that supports this subordination is the patriarchy—a system in which power is in the hands of men. Through the struggles of Sara, Ellie, and Meredith Hornsby, Dominic Smith illuminates the many ways women are disadvantaged by and struggle to overcome the forces of patriarchy in the very particular world of art.
Sara’s life as an artist is determined in large part by her connection to Barent and her sex. Barent makes the financial decisions for the family (disastrous ones), fully expects Sara to serve as a helpmeet to him as he produces his art and feels entitled to direct Sara in what she may paint in order to support the family. No one questions this role, and the guild—the central institution that controls the production and sale of art in Amsterdam during the Golden Age—reinforces this by tying Sara’s ability to sell her art to the choices of her husband.
Sara also encounters obstacles because of the way her sex shapes her day-to-day life. She must balance childcare with her artistic practice, and housekeeping—a quite arduous process in the 17th century—consumes so much time that “Dutch women didn’t paint landscapes in the seventeenth century […] because the genre required long hours spent alone outside, a clear impediment to the Holland housewife of the Golden Age” (31). Sara loses the gendered props of her identity—child, husband, home—during periods of her life, resulting in some space and time to create her masterworks. The fact that it takes devastating tragedies for Sara to produce her transcendent works underscores that being a woman in a patriarchal society of the 17th century is incompatible with being a working artist. Her last work—a self-portrait she has the liberty to create because she is dying—is the clearest expression of the way women must surrender almost everything in order to call themselves artists.
Hundreds of years later, the stories of Ellie and Meredith Hornsby demonstrate that women must still pay enormous costs in order to enter the world of art. In Meredith’s case, becoming an art historian requires much more than what is asked of men. Meredith tells Ellie, “Even with good luck on my side, I’m here before the men every morning and I have more students than any of them. Getting tenure was blood sport” (110). Meredith is part of the second wave of women who fought against exclusion from traditionally male spaces like academia. When Meredith tells Ellie to “[k]eep de Vos in the margins” (110), the advice is meant to help Ellie, but this advice shows that one of the costs of being included is to perpetuate the marginalization of women like Sara de Vos.
Explicitly, Ellie chooses another way—writing her dissertation on Dutch women artists of the Golden Age and later curating the Sydney exhibit—and in covert, transgressive ways when she becomes a forger. She struggles to understand why she violated the ethics of her field by doing the forgery. By the end of the novel, she comes to understand this one transgression was the break with the past permitting her to break other boundaries and become the academic she wants to be.
Still, Ellie pays many tolls because of her sex. Ellie is an art historian rather than an artist, and the construction of that life is only possible because of her paying gig as a conservationist and the mobility she experiences as a childfree, single woman. Ellie pays a psychological toll—imposter syndrome—because she is a working-class woman from a settler colony who must present as an expert on art of a society built in part on her very exclusion and subordination.
The way in which these women manage to subvert patriarchy’s subordination of women is instructive. At the Edge of a Wood comes from Sara’s decision to use her painting to do her griefwork, although she feels compelled to paint over herself in the final version. At the end of her life, impending death allows her to escape this need to hide her signature as an artist. This painting, along with the other two, reveal her as the master she truly is, and secures her places among the more lauded male artists of the Golden Age.
Ellie’s ability to be heard and seen in her chosen field only comes once she is willing to recover the lost history of women artists and center them in her work—first with the dissertation and later with the art exhibit in Sydney, her discovery of Sara’s work, and her mentoring the next generation of art historians (Hendrik) to move women’s work to the center. Smith’s ultimate message seems to be that women must be willing to tell their own stories if they are ever to claim their own power.
Although the novel is literary fiction—particularly in its focus on character—the question of whether Ellie’s past will catch up with her adds to the tension in the plot, especially in the first half of the novel. Ellie’s ability to move forward with her life slowly comes as she accepts the impact of the past on who she is today.
Marty undergoes a parallel struggle in coming to terms with his treatment of Ellie. Marty is at the end of his life, however, so his struggle extends to coming to terms with his inevitable future: death. Overshadowing all of this are Sara’s three surviving paintings; her work somehow always focuses on the theme of coming to terms with death.
Ellie is perennially stuck. She recognizes this as she looks over her early journals and notes that even as a teen, her sense of grievance over being ignored in her family, in school, and at her internship left with a deep sense of anger and self-doubt. She is haunted by Michael Franke’s dismissal of her abilities when she was 16, so much so that “whenever she was cleaning or inpainting a canvas—a sense that she had no business engaging in this work” (88) would virtually overwhelm her. Ellie’s sense that a person like her—a woman, a Catholic, of working-class background, and an Australian—has no business doing the work she does is classic imposter syndrome. This certainly reflects the challenges of entering a world in which one is an outsider, but also shows Ellie’s internalization of the idea that who she is in the present and future must be determined by who she was in the past.
Painting the forgery as “retribution” (88) against this world and her own past fails to free Ellie. Despite her successes as an academic art historian, Ellie sees her life as a “beautiful fake” (261) because she has failed to do the work of freeing herself from her own emotional baggage. The possibility that Marty may unveil her as a literal forger is only the most concrete possible consequence of this failure. When Marty does finally show up offering apologies, grace, and the ability and financial means to destroy the forged copy of At the Edge of a Wood, he also offers Ellie a way forward from her past. Marty’s granting of a do-over frees Ellie to do productive, new work on Sara’s paintings and even opens the possibility that she may paint again one day. The academic work she chooses to do, recovering even more of Sara’s history and work, also has the added benefit of establishing a more central role for women in the history of art. In Ellie’s case, the stories she tells about the past must change for Ellie’s present and future to change.
Marty, in his 90s by the present-day events in the novel, is up against the existential question of what his life really meant. The pilgrimage to Sydney with the painting is his effort to make amends for his cruel treatment of Ellie, while his purchase of the forgery allows him to make her life better in a concrete way by removing the evidence of her transgression. Marty is also deeply concerned with his legacy. He is childless, so his ability to leave his stamp on the world after death will not take the form of blood relatives. Marty, instead, has the paintings. Staring at his own mortality, Marty takes comfort in the fact they connect him to a long “bloodline of want, to shipbuilders and bankers who stared up at them as their own lives tapered off” (261). That shared experience of confronting death in the face of enduring art is how Marty ultimately comes to terms with his own death.
Sara’s three paintings underscore the struggles with the past and death. At the Edge of a Wood is her effort to come to terms with the death of her daughter, and she eventually reflects that the painting may well be her effort to “paint an allegory of her daughter’s transit between the living and the dead” (42). Winter with a Child’s Funeral Procession is a monument to Griet’s grief and “the desolation of the spirit” (222) of a town destroyed by plague. As early as the 1700s, the town is already verging on ruins, so Sara’s capturing of this grief in her painting is one of the ways the emotional impact of such tragedy is preserved for future viewers. Sara’s self-portrait, filled with her regret about dying and her inability to continue painting, is her way of dealing with her own mortality and creating a lasting mark of her own existence. In the end, each of these characters cope with the past and death through their relationship with art.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: