50 pages • 1 hour read
Dashiell HammettA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Hardboiled detective fiction centers around corruption, and the world of The Thin Man is Prohibition, during which every layer of society is infused with deceit and law breaking. Because having a glass of wine renders one a criminal, almost everyone is corrupt, and so no one can be trusted. Nick Charles searches for the truth, something that is hard to find in this story’s amoral world.
That corruption creates distrust is evident in how people treat Nick. While he has a better reputation than most, it only goes so far. People trust that he’ll treat them fairly, and almost every character goes to him for advice. Despite this, they also assume he is lying about working on the case. The police, while working with him, assume he is lying to them, and when asked if he is being straightforward, Nick responds, “Practically,” knowing that he won’t be believed and that it will sound even more suspicious to declare he’s being honest. Nick knows his audience. Their corruption affects how they see him, and his careful evasions and sarcastic responses enable him to avoid having to lie. Nick knows that the level of lying and corruption in his world are such that complete honesty is impossible.
Lying has become second nature to most of the characters. Dorothy was raised in a family so full of lies and ill-will that she doesn’t know how to tell the truth. Even when she is genuine, she can't seem to tell the truth. Mimi, on the other hand, lies so often and so badly that the corruption is inseparable from the rest of her. It annoys Nick that she is so terrible at it, and it makes discovering even the smallest clue difficult. She is so dishonest that she contradicts herself within sentences, not realizing she exposed her lies.
As Nick reveals the solution to Nora at the end, she frequently interrupts him, asking if anything is known for certain or can be proved. Because Nora is the one person who doesn’t need to lie, as her money protects her from having to get her hands dirty in the corrupt society, she fills in for a justice-seeking reader, wanting facts that will convict the guilty and expose the untruths. Nick pours cold water on her desires, telling her detectives deal in “probably,” not facts (199).
In the society of the hardboiled novel, the characters representing justice beat the prisoners, drink the liquor, and commit the murders. Truth and justice remain elusive, a seeming contradiction in a genre about discovering truth and delivering justice. In The Thin Man, there is no confession, and the Wynant/Jorgensen family will most likely inherit a lot of money and “go on being themselves” (21). The lack of truth and justice causes Nora to declare at the end that “it’s all pretty unsatisfactory” (201), an outsider’s perspective on the dark worldview explored by the genre.
The Thin Man is unusual for a hardboiled detective novel in that it is humorous, and the theme of Humor as an Antidote for Darkness features throughout. Hammett’s readers were in the first years of the Great Depression, and the darkness of the genre was only too present in the real world of 1933. Hammett capitalized on the desire for escape that took people to theaters to see 42nd Street and King Kong the same year The Thin Man was published. The rich, carefree, and humorous couple was an antidote for the bleakness of reality and a counterbalance to the usual grit of hardboiled fiction.
Detectives in this genre are typically sarcastic, and Nick Charles retains the biting wit of his colleagues. However, he lacks the bitterness that usually accompanies the hardboiled protagonist. Nick enjoys life, making his sarcasm less venomous and his wit a method for eluding questions and making light of dark situations. In Nick, the typical world-weary detective transforms into a fun-loving, intelligent husband who disarms people with his wit and sidesteps tough questions with humor. The sarcasm proves his street-smart credentials, but he delivers it with a wink that lightens a situation as dark as murder. When Wynant’s body is discovered, Nick’s quip about him being as “thin as the paper he’s writing letters on” is typical (190). It adds a smile to an otherwise grim moment.
While the wordplay is mostly credited to Nick (though Nora gets some good lines as well), the behavior of the characters also helps lighten what might otherwise be a dark tone in the novel. Dorothy and Mimi both constantly make a play for Nick and provide ample opportunity for what could be marital strife and drama. These situations end up appearing ridiculous in the hands of Nick and Nora, such as when Nora finds her husband embracing Dorothy. The couple make faces at each other over her head and go on with business rather than make a scene.
Gilbert also provides comic relief, as his off-the-wall questions to Nick become even more ridiculous when treated with the logical, often witty seriousness with which Nick responds. Information about cannibalism and what being shot by a gun feels like isn’t necessarily funny, but that Nick knows the answers to the obscure questions and the way he responds with factual evidence make the gruesome inquiries seem silly. The darkest things in the world, even the darkness of the Great Depression, cannibalism, and murder, can be lightened by Nick’s straightforward wit.
Physical comedy also abounds. Near the beginning, the dog, Asta, is described as knocking over a table at a department store, and this type of comedy doesn’t stop until the final reveal. People throw pans at each other, have barroom brawls, and escape out of windows in ways that both acknowledge gritty violence and render it ridiculous. Nick grabbing Mimi, who is in a violent tantrum, while Gilbert ineffectually flails could be seen as disturbing, and yet it becomes funny with Nick yelling at Gilbert, “We can fight afterwards” (147), and Nora solving everything by throwing cold water on it. Likewise, the policeman John Guild’s shock at Mimi cursing Macaulay with a string of profanities is humorous. That Nick has to take care of subduing the murderer because Guild is so startled is a humorous way to end an otherwise dark unmasking of greed and murder.
All of this contributes to the lightness of the novel, which walks the line between the hardboiled genre and comedy, making it unique in that it uses humor to play against Hammett’s usual hardboiled tone and mood.
No character in The Thin Man can escape their past, and every suspect has something that comes back to bite or help them. Nora and Guild are the only characters whose pasts enable them to make good decisions in the present. Nora’s past provides her with money, and so she is able to live a life that makes her the rational, sane force for good in the novel. Guild encountered Nick as a young police officer, and so when he meets Nick again, he immediately understands the value of having him on his side.
The rest of the characters are more negatively affected by their past. Nick, despite being the sleuth and the protagonist, has his past get in the way of progress multiple times. His work as a detective was famous enough that no one can imagine his presence in New York as a private citizen, and all the characters from Morelli to Guild to the press mistakenly assume he is working in his old capacity, despite his objections that he retired five years ago. Nick’s past as a lady’s man also comes back to bite him, as Mimi constantly hints that they had a relationship. Real or imagined, it makes Dorothy jealous and causes Guild to suspect Nick. For Nick, his background and reputation make his current life more difficult, and instead of shaking it, he enforces it by solving the case.
Like Nick, both Victor Rosewater and Julia Wolf are negatively affected by their past. Julia’s old criminal activity and the boyfriend she hoped to marry were seen as a threat by Macaulay, who kills her to make sure she won’t talk about her scheme with her former lover. Similarly, Chris Jorgensen is recognized by Nick as well as a friend of his wife as Victor Rosewater the moment he comes back to New York. Being exposed as the man who threatened Clyde Wynant ruins Rosewater’s scheme of living off Wynant’s ex-wife as a form of revenge. His time living as a parasite is thwarted by his past catching up to him.
Dorothy and Gilbert Wynant are young, but they also have things in their past that affect them. Dorothy’s past becomes what Nick calls a reoccurring gag, as she’s never able to get over the “thing that happened to [her] when [she] was a child” that made her what she is today (148). Gilbert is unhappy because in the past, Dorothy looked up to him and asked him questions, but now Nick has taken that role. This causes him to behave strangely toward Nick and seek attention by telling lies about how much his father revealed to him.
The final and most damning example of the past being inescapable is the clue that leads Nick to suspect Macaulay. After Macaulay mentions to Nora that Nick saved his life in World War I, Nick remembers that he is a terrible shot. The fact that the killer emptied his guns to kill his victims shows that the killer was also a bad shot. Nick puts Macaulay’s poor marksmanship together with the murder method and makes a correct conclusion about the identity of the killer. In The Thin Man, anything one did or achieved in the past, for good or bad, is inescapable and has powerful influences over the present.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Dashiell Hammett