71 pages • 2 hours read
Liu Cixin, Transl. Ken LiuA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The Three-Body Problem opens with a struggle session. This violent scene depicts the intersection between politics and science, in which a well-regarded scientist is put on trial for his failure to properly implement the correct political ideology in his work. His work isn’t dialectical, his wife accuses, meaning that he has failed to adhere to communist ideology. Ye Zhetai is unapologetic. He doesn’t believe that science and politics are compatible in this sense, given that science—and, in his particular case, physics—are beholden to a universal set of laws that are objective and apolitical. After he refuses to integrate politics into his science, Ye Zhetai is beaten to death by a group of radical students. His daughter watches. The violent scene depicts the stakes of the battle between politics and science. The battle is uneven, the scientists vastly outnumbered by the political activists. Adherents of politics and science are both devoted, however. The battle is a matter of life and death for those involved and, over the course of the novel, these stakes continue.
Ye Wenjie is traumatized by her father’s death during the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Her experience imbues her with a sense of nihilism that she never really escapes. Although she’s well aware of society’s political boundaries, she seeks small ways to rebel. Through censored books, she hopes to find something resembling a cure for her nihilism. When she’s caught, however, the necessity of political correctness becomes keenly apparent. She’s put on trial and threatened with punishment unless she confesses to her father’s crimes. She refuses, continuing his legacy of scientific defiance in the face of politics. The battle seems to be raging on, but then Ye discovers the brittle reality of this supposed truth. Her scientific background is too useful to the government, so concessions are made. She’s given the opportunity to redeem herself on the Red Coast Base by conducting scientific research. Rather than being at odds with one another, science and politics can coexist under the cynical, pragmatic eye of political operatives like Commissar Lei. He steals Ye’s research and publishes it under his own name, bolstering his reputation at her expense. Then, through no action of her own, Ye is politically rehabilitated. Her father’s crimes are forgotten because society has simply moved on. Nothing is materially different, but her life’s political context has changed and—with it—the political reality. Politics don’t really matter in the novel anyway because they’re vague and mutable, subject to changes based on self-interest and forces beyond the characters’ control.
This is further ratified at the end of the novel, as governments from vastly different political backgrounds unite in their scientific campaign against the Trisolarans. China and NATO work together, despite their previous political antagonism, under the banner of science. The existence of an external threat unites different political entities. Science is supposedly an objective, external system that transcends individual politics. Ye Zhetai’s death and the changing political climate show that science remains beholden to cultural and political context, however. Like the Cultural Revolution, the knowledge of the Trisolarans changes the context in which science operates. Science and politics are mutually linked, both pretending that they’re immutable and objective while operating in a fashion completely beholden to one another.
A defining feature of Ye as a character is that she views humanity as irredeemably evil. Her view is informed by personal and social experiences. She witnessed her father being beaten to death by political radicals. In addition, she witnessed the vast deforestation of rural areas of China to fuel the development of the same regime that radicalized the people who killed her father. Humans, from her perspective, can’t be trusted to be civil to one another and can’t be trusted as custodians of the natural world. However, Ye is a scientist. She recognizes that this damning judgment is inherently subjective. She can recognize the limitations of her personal perspective, which is why she’s so interested in the search for extraterrestrial life. To Ye, an alien culture would be technologically (and, by implication, morally) advanced enough to judge humanity for its sins. In the form of this alien culture, Ye would have her external, objective vector of moral judgment. She believes that any alien culture would agree with her bleak view of humanity and craves the opportunity validate her beliefs. When she gets the chance to talk to an alien culture, however, she breaks from the desire for objectivity and goes straight to subjectivity. She calls on the Trisolarans to invade and offers to help. Ye, as a scientist, recognizes her subjectivity, but her actions reveal her hypocrisy.
Another way that the narrative reveals the importance of perspective is through the relationship between Shi and Wang. The blunt, rogue street cop and the family-orientated scientist have very different perspectives on the world. Wang sees the world through the eyes of a researcher in the field of practical sciences. Even at home, his hobby as a photographer encourages him to see the world’s beauty through the lens of his camera. Shi, in contrast, is a cynic. Chasing criminals has given him a unique understanding of the world and a capacity for innovative thought that far exceeds many scientists. As Wang learns, Shi lacks the academic language to express his intelligence but is demonstrably very clever. His plan to attack the ETO ship succeeds exactly as planned, at a time when the world’s best scientists couldn’t agree on any plan at all. In addition, Shi shows a level of emotional intelligence that far exceeds most. At the end of the novel, his discussion about locusts, humans, and technology helps Wang see the world in a different way. Shi changes Wang’s perspective on the future of humanity.
The similarities between Ye and the Trisolaran listener illustrate the importance of perspective. To the people of Earth, Ye is the greatest villain in humanity’s history. She broadcast the planet’s location and invited an alien invasion, acting alone to doom an entire species. To the Trisolarans, she’s a heroic figure whose actions have potentially saved their civilization. In contrast, the Trisolarans regard the listener as the greatest criminal in their civilization’s history. He tried to avert Ye’s actions and save humanity, thereby dooming his own people. To the humans, however, the listener is a tragic figure whose tried in vain to protect a weaker, more vulnerable species. In this way, the question of moral judgment is inherently subjective. Depending on whether the perspective is that of a Trisolaran or a human, Ye and the listener are potentially heroes or villains. The question of which character acted correctly has no objective answer because the philosophical reasoning for their actions is affected by their subjective experience of the world as well as the perspective of the person casting judgment. The quest for objectivity falters in the face of the many competing, subjective perspectives.
Many of the novel’s characters display a universal, fundamental quality that’s hindered by social, political, and natural forces. Although they may not realize it, many of the characters are very similar. One of the most telling moments in Ye’s career is when she writes to an American scientist about his research. In his letter, he expresses surprise that someone in China would be working on such a project and he recommends that they work together in the future. Ye’s need to write the letter and the American’s surprise at her interest illustrates the cultural and political barriers that exist between like-minded people. The American couldn’t imagine that his work would be relevant in a place like China because political and ideological divisions have severed him from someone like Ye. Both Ye and the American scientist have a fundamental curiosity that helps them cross these barriers, revealing a universality that the characters in the novel are unwilling to acknowledge. In some instances, characters hope to achieve universality through something like physics. A universal, mathematical language is developed to be broadcast throughout the universe, for example, but even this is conditioned by the political requirements of such a message. Humans can’t help but inject a learned helplessness regarding universality into all their communications. Despite the evidence that so much unites people, they continually exaggerate their differences while ignoring their similarities.
This is even more apparent when Trisolaran culture begins to infiltrate Earth. Through the ETO, the Trisolarans develop a game that explains the three-body problem. The constant cycle of death and rebirth for their civilization becomes a video game that teaches people about how Trisolaran civilization was shaped. Importantly, the characters in this game take on human form. The true nature of the Trisolarans is never revealed because the Three Body game portrays most Trisolarans as human or even famous humans from history. This use of human culture to explain Trisolaran history hints at a universal experience. The humans who play Three Body come to understand the motivation of an alien culture because they can literally see themselves in the game. By fostering this sense of universal understanding, however, the Trisolarans are attempting to infiltrate humanity and make way for their own invasion. This expression of universality has an ulterior motive, even if it’s correct.
Later in the novel, the intercepted communications from the Trisolarans depict actual moments from Trisolaran history. In these exchanges, a mirror is created between Trisolaran society and human society. The meetings between the head of government and the scientists mirror those in the Battle Command Center, as desperate individuals wrestle with the fate of their species. The Trisolarans are forced to gamble by the tragic nature of their particular place in the universe, while the humans are forced into similar gambles because of the threat the Trisolarans pose. Both species develop dangerous pacifist movements internally, while also experiencing scientific failures and misunderstandings. The two species share an experience of terror and failure that transcends their physical differences. Both are motivated by survival, just like the locusts that Shi showed to Wang. The humans, the Trisolarans, and even the bugs share a universal desire to survive.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By these authors
Anthropology
View Collection
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Asian History
View Collection
Chinese Studies
View Collection
Climate Change Reads
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Fantasy
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Science Fiction & Dystopian Fiction
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
TV Shows Based on Books
View Collection
War
View Collection