logo

62 pages 2 hours read

Matthew B. Crawford

The World Beyond Your Head

Matthew B. CrawfordNonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2015

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3-EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3: “Inheritance”

Part 3, Chapter 13 Summary: “The Organ Maker’s Shop”

Crawford highlights the intricate craft of pipe organ making, exemplified by the work of George Taylor, John Boody, and their team in Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley. This team is deeply embedded in the rich tradition of organ making, a practice requiring extensive knowledge and skill passed down through generations of apprenticeships. The artisans at Taylor and Boody not only maintain historical techniques but also engage innovatively with tradition to improve their craft.

Crawford uses this setting to discuss broader themes about craftsmanship and the modern workforce. He criticizes the current educational and economic systems that favor generic skills and flexibility over deep, specialized knowledge. Contrary to the prevalent belief in continuous disruption, Crawford argues that engagement with a specific craft can foster both intellectual and moral growth. This is seen in how the craftsmen at Taylor and Boody derive meaning and a sense of continuity from their work, contributing to a tradition that links them with both past and future generations.

Furthermore, Crawford discusses the economic context, noting a resurgence of interest in specialty manufacturing in the US, where advanced digital tools have revitalized traditional crafts by lowering the costs of prototyping and manufacturing. He suggests that such developments allow for a new kind of economy where small-scale, high-skill manufacturing could thrive, providing a counter-narrative to mass production.

The narrative also touches on the broader “organ wars,” historical debates over the direction of organ making, which pit traditional craftsmanship against modern manufacturing techniques that prioritize volume and technological innovation over sound quality. These debates reflect deeper cultural tensions about the role of technology and the preservation of skilled labor, themes that Crawford highlights as central to understanding the value of craftsmanship in a modern context.

Moreover, Crawford delves into the subtleties of the Baroque organ sound that was revered by organ reformers. To gain a deeper understanding, he consults Frank Archer, an organist, who demonstrates the unique “chiff” sound of the Baroque organ at First Presbyterian Church in Farmville, Virginia. This sound—a breathy, percussive noise at the start of each note—is essential for clarity in contrapuntal music and helps in differentiating overlapping melodic lines, which is crucial in large, reverberant spaces like churches.

Crawford further explores how historical practices in organ making were abandoned for modern techniques that prioritized smoothness over the crisp, articulate sound of older organs. This shift led to a loss of the organ’s musical sharpness, a change driven by gradual alterations in the material properties of the pipes over generations, notably through the process of nicking the languid to mimic the aged sound of older pipes. This historical narrative of evolving musical taste and organ construction techniques underscores a cultural shift toward and then away from these modifications.

The reformation movement in organ building, Crawford points out, was not merely a return to old techniques but a rediscovery and affirmation of the organ’s historical sound qualities, which were deemed superior. This movement parallels broader themes of cultural preservation and innovation, where past practices are revisited not for nostalgia but for their inherent value in enhancing the future of the craft.

Additionally, Crawford discusses the sense of inheritance and tradition that energizes the craftsmen at Taylor and Boody, rather than weighing them down. He illustrates this through the story of Chris Bono, who, while restoring an organ at St. Francis church, chose to prioritize musical quality over strict historical accuracy, leading to his falling out with the Organ Historical Society. Bono’s modifications, which introduced Baroque elements into a non-Baroque organ, exemplify a craftsman’s evaluative approach toward historical artifacts, focusing on enhancing their function and musicality rather than preserving them unchanged.

The narrative highlights the dynamic of reverence and innovation that exists in the craft of organ building. Crawford explains that this is not merely about replicating historical techniques but engaging in a continuous dialogue with the past to innovate and improve upon it. This engagement is not confined to the craftsmen alone but extends to a broader community, including musicians and congregations, who interact with the final product.

The chapter concludes by contrasting the modern view of creativity as creatio ex nihilo (“creation out of nothing”) with the traditional craft perspective, where creativity is seen as emerging from within a continuum of past practices. Crawford argues that true creativity involves a deep engagement with tradition, which allows for a richer and more contextual understanding of craft, ultimately enabling craftsmen to produce work that is both historically informed and uniquely their own.

Epilogue Summary: “Reclaiming the Real”

Crawford explores the impact of our attentional environment and its manipulation by external forces, framing it within a broader socio-political context. He argues that the real issue with modern distractions extends beyond individual technologies to the overarching political economy that seeks to harvest our mental attention for profit. Crawford discusses the invasive nature of digital technologies and marketing strategies that exploit our attention, suggesting that this issue is deeply rooted in the cultural and economic systems we value.

He reflects on his personal experiences and observations, using them to challenge the Enlightenment ideals that emphasize autonomy and self-responsibility. Crawford points out that these ideals often fail to accommodate the deeply social and interconnected nature of human cognition and knowledge. By examining various professions and activities that require a high degree of skill and concentration—such as cooking, music, and craftwork—he highlights how these practices provide a counter-narrative to the individualistic framework of knowledge acquisition.

Moreover, Crawford critiques the modern emphasis on liberation from authority, suggesting that it has led to a form of adolescence rather than mature independence. He argues for a reevaluation of the social and communal aspects of knowledge and attention, proposing that engaging in traditions and crafts can help cultivate a more grounded and enriched sense of individuality and community.

Crawford calls for an awareness of the “attentional commons,” a shared space where individual attention is respected and preserved from commercial exploitation. He advocates for creating environments that encourage genuine interaction and focus, rather than perpetuating distraction and superficial engagement.

Additionally, Crawford argues for an ethics rooted in “affection for the world as it is” (253), contrasting this approach with modern society’s tendency to shield the self from reality through digital and abstract interactions. He points to moments in classic Disney animations where characters, like Donald Duck ice skating, engage directly and skillfully with their environments, utilizing physical affordances creatively and effectively. These moments, Crawford suggests, reveal the rich potential for human action and interaction with the physical world, inspiring a sense of wonder and connection that he describes as erotic in its draw toward beauty and engagement.

Crawford extends this discussion to democracy, critiquing the flattening of human experiences into generic categories that strip individuals of their unique skills and accomplishments. He champions a view of democracy that celebrates and recognizes human excellence and superiority in various forms, suggesting that truly seeing and appreciating the capabilities and achievements of others can deepen democratic commitments rather than undermining them.

Furthermore, Crawford critiques the current educational model for its disconnection from the tangible world, which fails to engage many students. He advocates for a more hands-on approach to learning that aligns with students’ interests and the realities of the physical world, suggesting that such an approach can make subjects like trigonometry fascinating when linked to practical activities like building a race car. This type of education recognizes and harnesses the intrinsic motivations and passions of students, fostering a connection to learning that is deeply rooted in real-world applications and experiences.

Part 3-Epilogue Analysis

In this final section, the author explores the niche world of organ making, using this as a vehicle to discuss broader themes of craftsmanship, tradition, and modernity. In Chapter 13, Crawford details the physical and cultural environment of the organ makers’ workshop. His vivid imagery, such as describing the workshop, “the entire west-facing wall was windows looking out onto rolling green farmland” (212), not only paints a picturesque scene but also situates the reader within a specific, tangible setting. Furthermore, this discussion of organ making is peppered with references to historical practices and figures, such as Johann Sebastian Bach and the Baroque era, which align with Crawford’s elevation of the deep, historical roots of craftsmanship. These references contextualize the organ making within a larger tradition, highlighting the continuity and changes over time. By drawing parallels between the organs and “the Apollo moon rockets” (211), Crawford elevates the craft to a monumental status, thereby enhancing the reader’s appreciation of this art form.

Through this discussion, Crawford reinforces the theme of The Role of Skill and Craftsmanship in Achieving Fulfillment. Crawford includes a substantial amount of technical detail about the organ-making process, such as the description of mixing lead and tin for pipe making. This not only informs the reader but also immerses them in the specificity of the craft and showcases the depth of the craft and its evolution, emphasizing the interconnectedness of technique, cultural heritage, and personal dedication. Crawford frequently contrasts the values and practices of traditional craftsmanship with modern industrial processes. By discussing the “organ wars” and the shift toward electronic organs, he highlights a broader cultural and philosophical debate about the role of technology in society.

In the Epilogue, Crawford provides other skillsets and careers that remain engaging in a distracted, technological world. He discusses the “short-order cook, the hockey player, the motorcycle racer, the jazz musician, the glassblower, and the organ maker” (248) as exemplars of “well-ordered ecologies of attention” (248). These examples resonate with readers by demonstrating tangible instances where focused attention results in mastery and fulfillment, contrasting sharply with the distracted modern existence that Crawford critiques and thematically supporting Strategies for Reclaiming Focus and Engagement by giving readers examples of activities to pursue.

Crawford’s beliefs are well-supported and thoroughly addressed throughout The World Beyond Your Head. However, Crawford’s critique sometimes assumes that technological progress and traditional craftsmanship are inherently at odds, as Crawford regularly discusses The Impact of Technology and Advertising on Individual Agency. This perspective might overlook how technology can complement and enhance traditional crafts, as well as the potential for new technologies to create new forms of craftsmanship and skill. Moreover, Crawford’s focus on high-level craftsmanship, such as organ building, may not universally apply to all forms of work or craftsmanship. The intensive, deeply skilled work involved in organ making is a rarefied field. This focus might limit the applicability of his ideas to broader discussions about work and technology in less specialized or artistic fields.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 62 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools

Related Titles

By Matthew B. Crawford