47 pages • 1 hour read
Gordon KormanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The power dynamics between children and adults play an important role throughout Zoobreak. The children in the novel are resourceful and smart, but despite these qualities, they are still children in an adult world, which puts limitations on what they can achieve and the decisions they can make. Through Savannah’s drive to save Cleopatra, Ben’s impending change of schools, and the outcome of Operation Zoobreak II, Zoobreak explores how children exercise power and agency despite the limitations associated with youth.
The process Savannah goes through to find and rescue Cleopatra shows how children must be creative to wield power. When Savannah first realizes Mr. Nastase has Cleopatra captive, she investigates official channels, such as hiring a lawyer and getting a DNA test for the monkey, to prove Cleopatra is hers. However, while these methods are legal and provide an official path to Cleopatra’s freedom, they require adult intervention and resources that Savannah doesn’t have as an 11-year-old. Instead of giving up, she and the group develop a plan tailored to being a child in an adult world. Griffin’s zoobreak plan accomplishes what the children otherwise couldn’t do without help from adults. The successful scouting mission, the changes in the plan once they have more information about Klaus and the fence, and the group’s ability to pivot as the situation changes (such as when Darren doesn’t show) exemplify the creativity and quick-thinking necessary to make the plan powerful. Together, Savannah’s determination and the resulting rescue show that children have just as much power to achieve their goals.
The storyline surrounding Ben’s narcolepsy shows how children require unconventional solutions to maintain their power in an adult-centered world. In Chapter 6, while Griffin discusses the sleep school with his dad, he thinks that Ben must go because “he was a kid in an adult world, and that was a powerless thing to be” (37). Ben has no say in the matter because Ben’s desire not to change schools (motivated by missing his friends) is viewed as less important than his narcolepsy by adults. This highlights the power dynamics at play between adults and children—adult reasons are often given more weight. While both Ben and his parents can likely agree that something needs to happen to help his narcolepsy, the decision to switch schools is made for him. Only later, when the school nurse discovers how the ferret helps Ben’s condition, do Ben’s parents start to realize there might be more options for Ben. Using the ferret as a support animal gives Ben power and agency because it offers a preferred way for him to get his narcolepsy under control. This power ultimately results in Ben staying at his school, showing how an unconventional solution gets Ben what he wants in a situation otherwise controlled by adults.
Operation Zoobreak II additionally shows how children can exercise power in adult situations. Unlike the previous two operations, Operation Zoobreak II puts the children in true danger from Mr. Nastase. Instead of panicking, the children assess the situation and work with what they have to save themselves. While the children could have called the police as Darren’s parents did, they realized that doing so would have exposed how they illegally broke into the Long Island Zoo. In addition, the police would take time to get there, and Mr. Nastase is an immediate threat. The children know they can call for help once they are safe and have the situation under control. Choosing to handle the situation themselves is risky but reveals forethought and understanding of their situation. The children know there will be consequences for their actions and thus seek a way to minimize those consequences. Organizing a plan to rescue Griffin and Ben using each person’s individual skills shows that the children have the knowledge and skill to get themselves out of danger without adult intervention.
Though children often must be more creative than adults, this does not mean that children are powerless. Adults have more resources and access to channels that children do not, but the events of Zoobreak reveal that children can accomplish just as much or more than adults when they use avenues that are open to them. As seen by the questionable legality of Griffin’s plans, having access to such power doesn’t mean it should be used, but just knowing the options exist is empowering and uplifting for young readers.
Throughout Zoobreak, trust and teamwork are at the core of the heist and the relationships between the characters. By the end of the book, they learn that trust improves relationships and outcomes, and they also discover when it is okay not to trust. Through the group dynamics during operations and Darren’s character arc, the novel explores the role trust plays in teamwork and growth.
The definition of teamwork is rooted in trust, and Zoobreak highlights how trust can affect a group dynamic both positively and negatively. At the beginning of the book, the group has a level of trust in one another because they successfully worked together in the past, and each knows that the others can perform their part on a mission. Each child in Griffin’s group has their own strengths, showing how unique qualities let them shine as individuals and as part of the team. Pitch’s ability to climb lets her scout ahead and reach areas the others can’t. It also lets her assess how the others would respond to a climbing situation, and in this way, Pitch’s skill makes her a valuable member of the team and emphasizes her individuality. Similarly, Melissa’s gifts with technology give her the knowledge of how to conduct surveillance, which both shows off her skills and makes her a useful part of Griffin’s team. The same goes for the other children, and without each of their unique skill sets, the team would not function as well as it does. The relationships between the members of Griffin’s group show how a team can work together and trust one another, even in high-stakes situations.
While this trust acts as a baseline for the operations they undertake, the operations themselves challenge this trust. Savannah’s ultimatum that the group free all the animals during Operation Zoobreak, for example, is not part of the original plan and places all of the children on the spot to make a big decision based on their trust in Savannah. Up until this point, the children trusted in Griffin’s plan, even if everything didn’t go exactly as he thought, but taking all the animals leaves the group in a situation where they have to trust Savannah’s knowledge and experience with animals. This puts pressure on the group going forward. The group is forced to keep secrets and hope that Savannah is right, things that fray trust because the children don’t know if they did the right thing. As Mr. Nastase’s true nature is revealed, the children realize that, though housing the animals has been stressful, Savannah is right. Clearing up the uncertainty of their actions helps the others trust Savannah going into Operation Zoobreak II.
Darren’s character arc shows the danger of trusting in the wrong people. First, the group places their trust in Darren, though they aren’t particularly fond of him and haven’t built the same relationship as they have with one another. Then, once Darren realizes the group went through with the zoobreak and has the animals, his trust turns inward to his belief he can steal the animals and sell them for profit. This leads Darren to trap the escaped owl and go to Mr. Nastase, believing that putting trust in an adult will achieve the outcome Darren wants. When Mr. Nastase threatens to turn Darren in for a crime he didn’t commit, Darren realizes he has misplaced his trust and gotten himself in deep trouble by doing so. Instead of going to adults he knows he can trust (such as his parents), Darren tries to fix the situation on his own, which only serves to put the other children in danger and erode Darren’s trust in himself. Not only did he fall into Mr. Nastase’s trap, but he also made the situation worse for humans and animals alike. At the end of the book, Darren trusts the police with what he learned about Mr. Nastase, which gets him and the other children out of trouble. When Darren decides to trust the right people, he works toward undoing the harm he caused, showing the importance of not trusting unthinkingly. When there is certainty, trust brings more positive outcomes than when trust is given without reason or understanding.
Zoobreak explores how humans and animals can grow to understand one another’s unique needs. The animal neglect that occurs in All Aboard Animals contrasts with Savannah’s passion for animals, driving the main storyline and primary conflict. Through Savannah’s character, how the animals adapt to the children’s homes, and Ben’s relationship with the ferret, Korman examines the many ways animals and humans can interact and coexist.
Savannah is known to be an animal expert, and the team relies on her expertise in animal welfare throughout the novel. Even before the heist begins, her pets exemplify her knowledge of and comfort level with animals. Not only does she have a monkey as a pet, an exotic animal with complex needs, but she also has a dog that frightens the other children. Her dog is known for not being a welcoming presence to the other children in the group, suggesting that the dog may have complex behavioral needs or is otherwise intimidating or overbearing. On top of Savannah’s relationship with her pets, the dog and the monkey have formed a unique bond despite their species differences, reflective of their owner’s temperament and love for animals.
After the first Zoobreak plan, the children are left with exotic animals they have freed from the zoo. While Savannah prefers to give the animals to her friend at the local zoo straight away, she must instead help the other children house the animals safely in the interim. The animals take to the children’s homes with varying levels of success, showing how every creature adapts differently to a situation and highlighting how important proper animal care truly is. In Chapter 21 when Griffin and Savannah realize the meerkat is living like it would in the wild, Savannah tells Griffin to keep food in the greenhouse so the meerkat will associate it with safety. When Griffin asks if that really works, Savannah says it should but that “nothing is certain when you’re dealing with living creatures, each with its own unique temperament” (149). The meerkat at Griffin’s and beaver at Logan’s house adapt to their environments, treating their temporary homes like their natural habitats because they have been given the freedom to do so. By contrast, Pitch gluing the chipmunks’ mouths shut with peanut butter has made it difficult for the creatures to behave as they naturally would, showing how human influence can negatively affect animals’ livelihood and behavior. While the children taking care of the animals is not ideal, with Savannah’s help, they are providing better care than the animals received at All Aboard Animals.
Additionally, Ben develops a mutually beneficial relationship with the ferret, showing how animals and humans can sometimes become codependent and care for one another. When the children rescue the animals from All Aboard Animals, the ferret latches on to Ben because it views him as a parental figure and a place of safety. At first, Ben is annoyed by this because the animal insists on clinging to him, but as the story progresses, Ben realizes the ferret helps him as much as he helps it. The ferret’s close bond with Ben allows it to sense when Ben is falling asleep and rouse him. The ferret helps Ben stay awake, much like Ben helps the ferret feel protected. In the long term, the ferret’s aid allows Ben to stay at school with his friends, and Ben’s presence helps the ferret feel like it belongs. Ben and the ferret provide important support roles to one another. At the end of the book, the ferret makes a habit of biting Ben’s father, which symbolizes the uniqueness of its bond with Ben and how it has not formed this bond with everyone. Ben and the ferret are unique individuals who give each other something they cannot get on their own.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Gordon Korman
Action & Adventure
View Collection
Animals in Literature
View Collection
Canadian Literature
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Childhood & Youth
View Collection
Earth Day
View Collection
Juvenile Literature
View Collection
Laugh-out-Loud Books
View Collection
Power
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection